Feature Prioritization Using RICE and MoSCoW Frameworks

Prioritize features for the [PRODUCT NAME] MVP using RICE and MoSCoW frameworks.\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n**Product Context:**\\\\\\\\n- Problem solved: [PROBLEM]\\\\\\\\n- Target audience: [AUDIENCE]\\\\\\\\n- Core value proposition: [VALUE PROPOSITION]\\\\\\\\n- Launch timeline: [NUMBER] weeks\\\\\\\\n- Team: [NUMBER] devs + [NUMBER] designers\\\\\\\\n- Sprint duration: [DURATION]\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n**Features to prioritize:**\\\\\\\\n[LIST ALL FEATURES, e.g.:\\\\\\\\n1. Google/email signup\\\\\\\\n2. Main dashboard\\\\\\\\n3. Push notifications\\\\\\\\n4. Pix integration\\\\\\\\n5. In-app chat\\\\\\\\n6. PDF reports\\\\\\\\n7. Gamification\\\\\\\\n8. Public API\\\\\\\\n... up to N features]\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n**1) RICE Analysis (for each feature):**\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n| Feature | Reach (1-10) | Impact (0.25-3) | Confidence (0.5-1) | Effort (person-weeks) | RICE Score |\\\\\\\\n|---------|------|--------|------------|--------|-----|\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n*Scoring criteria:*\\\\\\\\n- Reach: how many users would use it in the first 30 days?\\\\\\\\n- Impact: how much does it contribute to the North Star Metric? (3=massive, 2=high, 1=medium, 0.5=low, 0.25=minimal)\\\\\\\\n- Confidence: how certain are we? (1=high, 0.8=medium, 0.5=low)\\\\\\\\n- Effort: person-weeks of work\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n**2) MoSCoW Classification:**\\\\\\\\n- **Must Have**: without this, the MVP doesn't work (max 40% of effort)\\\\\\\\n- **Should Have**: important but a workaround exists (30%)\\\\\\\\n- **Could Have**: nice-to-have (20%)\\\\\\\\n- **Won't Have (this time)**: backlog for v2 (10%)\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n**3) Final MVP Scope:**\\\\\\\\n- Selected features (Must + top Should)\\\\\\\\n- Total effort estimate\\\\\\\\n- Sprint-by-sprint timeline\\\\\\\\n- Cut features with justification\\\\\\\\n- Simplified versions of complex features (\\\\\\\\