Guide path
Read the article, then pick the next guide, prompt pack, or course path based on what you want to do next.
Open the curated guide layer before you pick a course or prompt pack.
Jump to the most relevant AI path for your profession.
Turn article ideas into reusable prompt systems.
Download free prompt packs tied to roles, workflows, and use cases.
Compare options before you spend more time or money.
Published Feb 28, 2026 • 22 min read
How marketing teams can use AI to produce more, test faster, and increase results without growing the team.
Key Takeaways
Guide stack
Most readers should leave with one of three next steps: a role guide, a prompt library section, or a course that matches the same problem.
Reader FAQ
If you want faster execution, open the prompt library. If you want a bigger decision, open the role guides or the course catalog.
Yes. Start with the guide hub, then use the sample lesson path or the prompt library before committing to membership.
Choose the next step that matches your job to be done, not the most popular page.
Keep learning
Continue with practical courses connected to this topic.
Marketing teams in Brazil that have adopted AI with a structured process are producing 3x more content with half the team and, more importantly, without losing quality.
This isn't a projection. It's what's already happening at agencies and marketing departments that stopped treating AI as a toy and started using it as infrastructure.
Marketing with AI isn't about publishing more random content. It's about creating an execution system with speed, consistency, and continuous improvement.
This playbook is for Brazilian marketing teams that want to implement AI for real: with ready-to-copy prompts, tested workflows, and metrics to prove results.
If you want to accelerate with guided paths and ready-to-use templates, check out the AI courses for marketing at TakeAICourse.com.
The market has shifted faster than most professionals realize.
What's working:
What's not working:
| Metric | 2026 Reality |
|---|---|
| Marketing teams using AI daily in Brazil | ~45% |
| Average reported productivity gain | 2.5x to 4x |
| Cost reduction per content piece | 40-60% |
| Teams measuring AI ROI (vs. "gut feeling") | Only 22% |
| Marketing professionals with a prompt library | ~15% |
The opportunity is clear: most teams use AI without method. Those who implement with process capture real competitive advantage.
This comparison might sound exaggerated, but the numbers back it up.
| Metric | 8-Person Team (No AI) | 3-Person Team (With AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Blog posts per month | 8 | 12 |
FAQ
| Social media posts per month |
| 30 |
| 45 |
| Campaign emails per month | 4 | 8 |
| Copy variations for ads | 4 per campaign | 12 per campaign |
| Campaign analysis time | 1 day | 2 hours |
| Monthly team cost (salary + benefits) | ~R$ 72,000 | ~R$ 32,000 |
| AI tools | R$ 0 | ~R$ 500 |
| Total monthly cost | R$ 72,000 | R$ 32,500 |
| Cost per content piece | R$ 1,714 | R$ 500 |
The 3-person team with AI spends 55% less and produces 50% more.
The secret isn't laying people off. It's reallocating. The 3 professionals with AI focus on strategy, creativity, and analysis. AI handles repetitive execution: copy variations, channel adaptations, first drafts, data analysis.
The question for marketing managers in 2026 isn't "Should I use AI?" It's "How do I reallocate my team so humans do what humans do best and AI handles the rest?"
The highest-leverage opportunities for Brazilian teams, ranked by impact:
Use AI to build the strategic foundation before producing any asset.
Critical point: Always validate the strategic angle before production. AI gives you the map—you choose the route.
Act as a digital marketing content strategist for [company type] in Brazil.
Context:
- Company: [name/description]
- Target audience: [detailed profile]
- Product/service: [what you sell]
- Active channels: [blog, Instagram, LinkedIn, email, YouTube]
- Monthly goal: [generate leads / nurture database / launch / branding]
Task: Create a 4-week editorial calendar with:
- 3 posts per week (12 total)
- For each: title, primary channel, format (carousel/video/article/story), angle, opening hook
- Distribution: 40% top of funnel, 35% middle, 25% bottom
- Consider relevant dates in Brazil for the month
- Include 1 "controversial" or counterintuitive post per week (drives engagement)
Deliver as a table format.
My business is [describe]. My audience searches for solutions to [problems].
List 20 content topics organized by intent:
INFORMATIONAL (top of funnel):
- 7 topics answering common questions
- Suggested format for each
COMPARISON (middle of funnel):
- 7 topics comparing solutions, methods, or products
- Suggested format for each
DECISION (bottom of funnel):
- 6 topics helping with purchase decisions
- Suggested format for each
For each topic, include: estimated search volume (high/medium/low), ranking difficulty (high/medium/low), and main keyword suggestion.
I need to create content about [topic] for [audience].
Give me 10 different angles to approach this topic:
- 3 educational angles (teach something practical)
- 2 storytelling angles (real or hypothetical story)
- 2 provocative angles (challenge a common belief)
- 2 data angles (based on numbers/research)
- 1 behind-the-scenes angle (show the process behind)
For each angle: suggested title, opening hook (1 sentence), and why it works.
Create a standard workflow that transforms a brief into a publishable final piece.
STEP 1: BRIEF (human — 5 min)
- Goal of the piece
- Specific audience
- Publishing channel
- Desired tone
- References (if any)
STEP 2: FIRST DRAFT (AI — 3 min)
→ Run production prompt with brief
STEP 3: CRITERIA REVIEW (human — 10 min)
- [ ] Is it hitting the right tone?
- [ ] Does it have data/concrete example?
- [ ] Is the CTA clear?
- [ ] Is the length right for the channel?
- [ ] No made-up information?
STEP 4: CHANNEL ADAPTATION (AI — 5 min)
→ Run channel variation prompt
STEP 5: PUBLISH + DOCUMENT (human — 5 min)
- Publish
- Log in control spreadsheet
- Save prompts that worked
Total time: ~28 minutes per complete piece (vs. 2-3 hours without AI).
Create a detailed outline for a blog article about:
Topic: [topic]
Main keyword: [keyword]
Audience: [profile]
Goal: [drive traffic / capture leads / educate / convert]
The outline should include:
1. SEO title (maximum 60 characters, with keyword)
2. Meta description (maximum 155 characters, with CTA)
3. Introduction: hook + article promise (3-4 lines)
4. H2s and H3s: minimum 6 sections, each with:
- Optimized subheading
- 2-3 bullet points of what to cover
- Content type (text/table/list/example/quote)
5. Conclusion with CTA
6. 3 internal link suggestions (pages on our site that make sense)
Format: clear hierarchical structure, ready to expand.
I have this content as a base (blog article):
[Paste article or summary]
Create adaptations for each channel:
INSTAGRAM (Carousel — 7 slides):
- Slide 1: provocative hook (question or strong statement)
- Slides 2-6: 1 insight per slide, short sentences, strategic emoji
- Slide 7: CTA + save this post
- Caption: 150 words, storytelling + CTA + 10 relevant hashtags
LINKEDIN (Long-form post):
- Hook in the first line (shows before "see more")
- 200-250 words, professional but not corporate tone
- End with an open question for engagement
- No excessive hashtags (maximum 5)
TWITTER/X (Thread — 8 tweets):
- Tweet 1: impactful hook with "thread 🧵"
- Tweets 2-7: 1 insight per tweet, maximum 240 characters
- Tweet 8: summary + CTA
WHATSAPP (Broadcast message):
- Maximum 3 lines
- Personal tone, like you're talking to a friend
- Link at the end
Keep the core message consistent across all channels.
Create a 5-email sequence for [goal: launch / nurture / re-engagement / onboarding].
Context:
- Product/service: [describe]
- Audience: [profile]
- Desired action: [buy / sign up / schedule demo / download resource]
For each email:
1. Send day (D+0, D+2, D+5, etc.)
2. Subject line (maximum 50 characters) + preview text (50 characters)
3. Body (150-200 words)
4. Main CTA (1 button)
5. PS (if applicable)
Rules:
- Email 1: introduce + deliver main value
- Email 2: social proof or use case
- Email 3: main objection and how to overcome it
- Email 4: urgency/scarcity (without being aggressive)
- Email 5: last chance + summary of benefits
Tone: direct, personal, like a 1-on-1 conversation. Natural Brazilian Portuguese.
Every cycle should end in a testable hypothesis. AI helps increase test volume without sacrificing quality.
Analyze the following marketing campaign data:
[Insert data: impressions, clicks, CTR, conversions, cost, CPA, ROAS, etc.]
Deliver:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (3 lines): what worked and what didn't
2. TOP 3 INSIGHTS: patterns explaining the results
3. HYPOTHESES: why the best creatives performed better
4. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS: 3 things to do this week
5. SUGGESTED TESTS: 3 A/B experiments for the next cycle
6. ALERT: any metric outside the norm that needs attention
Format: short bullets, actionable language. No fluff.
I ran an A/B test with these results:
VARIANT A (control):
- [metrics: impressions, clicks, CTR, conversions, etc.]
VARIANT B (test):
- [metrics: impressions, clicks, CTR, conversions, etc.]
Questions:
1. Is the difference statistically significant or just noise?
2. If there was a winner, WHY did it likely perform better?
3. What to test in the next cycle based on this learning?
4. Should I scale the winner or iterate more?
Consider: sample size, test duration, and confidence level.
I have this ad running:
Headline: [current headline]
Description: [current description]
CTA: [current CTA]
Audience: [segment]
Platform: [Google Ads / Meta Ads / LinkedIn Ads]
Create 5 testable variations, changing ONE variable at a time:
HEADLINE VARIATIONS (3):
- Approach test: pain vs. benefit
- Format test: question vs. statement
- Specificity test: generic vs. concrete number
CTA VARIATIONS (2):
- Urgency test: with vs. without
- Action test: "Learn more" vs. "[specific action]"
For each variation, explain: what changes, why test it, and which hypothesis to validate.
Without documentation, you go back to winging it. Everything that works needs to become a playbook.
Help me create a marketing playbook for my team.
Context:
- Company: [type]
- Team: [number and roles]
- Channels: [list]
- Tools used: [list]
- Publishing frequency: [per channel]
The playbook should include:
1. OVERVIEW
- Marketing mission in 1 sentence
- Priority audiences (personas)
- Brand tone and voice
2. PROCESSES BY CHANNEL
- For each channel: brief → production → review → publish → analyze
- Owners per step
- SLAs (maximum time per step)
3. PROMPT LIBRARY
- Categories: strategy, production, analysis, documentation
- Top 10 most-used prompts (with template)
4. CALENDAR AND CADENCE
- Frequency per channel
- Fixed dates throughout the year
- Weekly planning ritual
5. METRICS AND REPORTS
- KPIs per channel
- Weekly report template
- Decision criteria (when to pause, scale, or pivot)
Format: structured document, ready to share with the team.
Save prompts, templates, and learnings in an internal library accessible to the whole team. Update monthly based on results.
Let's simulate a real launch campaign, from scratch to publication. This type of project used to take 3-4 weeks and now takes 7-10 days with AI.
Task: Define positioning, audience, and core message.
I'm launching [product/service] for [audience] in Brazil.
Help me define:
1. Value proposition in 1 sentence (maximum 15 words)
2. 3 key messages that should appear in all communications
3. Primary and secondary audience (demographic + psychographic profile)
4. 5 objections the audience will have and how to address each one
5. Competitive advantage vs. [competitors]
6. Communication tone for the campaign
7. Campaign hashtag (if applicable)
Task: Produce all campaign assets.
Asset checklist (generate with AI, review as a human):
Estimated time with AI: 8-10 hours total (vs. 40+ hours without AI).
Task: Configure platforms and review everything.
Task: Build anticipation.
Create a 3-day pre-launch sequence for [product]:
DAY -3: Teaser (build curiosity without revealing)
- Instagram Story post
- "Something's coming" email
DAY -2: Partial reveal (show benefit without showing product)
- Instagram feed post
- Email with 1 highlighted feature
DAY -1: Social proof + urgency
- Testimonials (if beta testers available)
- "Tomorrow's the day" email
- Countdown Story
For each asset: ready-to-use copy + suggested visual.
Task: Launch, monitor, and optimize in real time.
Task: Extract learnings and document results.
Here are the results from the launch campaign:
[Collect all data: traffic, leads, conversions, CAC, ROAS, etc.]
Deliver:
1. Results vs. goals: did we hit them? Why or why not?
2. Top 3 creatives/channels that performed best
3. Bottom 3: what didn't work and hypotheses for why
4. Learnings for the next launch (5 points)
5. Recommended next steps (immediate + 30 days)
AI can reduce your cost per lead by 25-40% with a simple approach: test more variations, faster.
Without AI, most teams create 2-3 ad variations per campaign. They test slowly. They scale what "seems to work." They waste budget on mediocre creatives.
| Metric | Without AI | With AI |
|---|---|---|
| Ad variations tested/month | 4 | 20 |
| Testing budget (period) | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Average CPL of tested variations | $45 | $45 |
| CPL of best variation found | $32 | $18 |
| Monthly ad budget | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| Leads generated/month | 312 | 555 |
| Difference | — | +78% more leads |
The difference isn't that AI writes better copy. It's that you test more variations and find winners faster. Statistics on your side.
What works with AI:
Specific prompt:
Create an 8-card Instagram carousel about [topic].
Card 1: Hook (thought-provoking question or surprising statement)
Cards 2-6: 1 tip/insight per card (short phrase + emoji)
Card 7: Visual summary or checklist
Card 8: CTA (follow, save, comment, or click the link)
Suggested visual style: [clean/bold/minimalist]
Caption: 200 words with personal storytelling + CTA + 15 hashtags
Audience: [profile]
What works with AI:
Specific prompt:
Write a LinkedIn post about [topic].
Format:
- First line: hook that appears before "see more" (maximum 150 characters, impactful)
- Body: 200-300 words
- Structure: personal story/observation → insight → data/example → reflection → open question
- Tone: professional but human. Not corporate.
- No excessive emojis (maximum 3 in the entire post)
- 3-5 hashtags at the end
Goal: [drive engagement / position as authority / generate leads]
What works with AI:
Specific prompt:
Create 5 WhatsApp broadcast messages about [topic/product].
Rules:
- Maximum 3 lines per message (WhatsApp is quick reading)
- Personal tone, like you're talking to a friend
- Each message has 1 hook + 1 value + 1 simple CTA
- Doesn't feel like spam (nobody wants ads on WhatsApp)
- Variations: 2 informative, 2 value-driven, 1 offer
Goal: [nurture / sell / schedule / engage]
For ready-to-use sales prompts on WhatsApp, check out our post on AI prompts for WhatsApp sales.
What works with AI:
Specific prompt:
Generate 10 email subject line variations for:
Email goal: [inform / sell / re-engage / nurture]
Audience: [profile]
Email content: [summarize in 1 sentence]
Criteria:
- Maximum 50 characters (better mobile display)
- Mix of approaches: curiosity (3), benefit (3), urgency (2), personalization (2)
- No fake clickbait
- Natural PT-BR (not translated from English)
For each subject: suggested preview text (40 characters).
What works with AI:
Specific prompt:
Create assets for Google Responsive Search Ad:
Product/service: [describe]
Audience: [profile]
Main keyword: [keyword]
Landing page: [URL and brief description]
Deliver:
15 headlines (maximum 30 characters each):
- 5 with keyword
- 3 with benefit
- 3 with number/data
- 2 with CTA
- 2 with brand/differentiator
4 descriptions (maximum 90 characters each):
- 1 focused on main benefit
- 1 focused on social proof
- 1 focused on CTA + urgency
- 1 focused on differentiator
3 suggested sitelinks with descriptions.
Producing more doesn't help if you're not measuring. Here's the minimum dashboard every AI-powered marketing team needs.
| Metric | How to measure | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Pieces produced/month | Count deliverables | +50% vs. previous month |
| Average time per piece | Track with timer | Reduce 40% with AI |
| Cost per piece | (Salaries + tools) / pieces | Reduce 30% |
| First-draft approval rate | Approved / Total | >70% |
| Prompts in library | Count | +5 per month |
| Metric | How to measure | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Organic traffic | Google Analytics | Weekly |
| Leads generated | CRM / forms | Weekly |
| Cost per lead (CPL) | Budget / leads | Weekly |
| Conversion rate | Sales / leads | Monthly |
| ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) | Revenue / ad spend | Weekly |
| Engagement by channel | Native platform | Weekly |
| NPS / satisfaction | Survey | Monthly |
Every Monday morning, before planning the week:
Review previous week's numbers (15 min)
Update prompt library (10 min)
Define the week's focus (5 min)
If you don't know who you're talking to and what your value proposition is, AI will generate generic content. "Generic + volume = spam."
Example: An agency started using AI to create posts for all clients with the same prompt. Result: all clients had the same tone, same phrases, same style. 3 clients cancelled within 2 months because the content "didn't feel like their brand."
Solution: Create a specific context prompt for each brand/client. Include voice and tone, words they use and avoid, examples of content that worked.
AI hallucinates. Makes up statistics. Gets numbers wrong. Uses the wrong tone. If you publish without reviewing, you'll publish mistakes.
Example: An e-commerce site published an AI-generated product description that said "ANVISA approved" for a product that didn't have that approval. They received a legal notice.
Solution: Every AI output goes through a checklist: data verified? tone correct? information accurate? compliance respected?
"We published 45 posts this month!" Great. How many leads did they generate? What's the CPL? What's the ROAS? Volume without results is vanity.
Example: A team tripled their content production with AI but organic traffic dropped 15% because the texts were superficial and Google penalized them. More bad content = worse results.
Solution: For each piece, define the success metric before you produce it. If you can't define a metric, question whether you should produce it at all.
Prompts are like recipes: they need tweaking. The prompt that worked in January might not work in March because the market changed, the audience changed, the algorithm changed.
Example: A marketing team used the same email prompt for 6 months. Open rate dropped from 28% to 14%. The subject line became predictable. When they updated the prompt with data on subject lines that had worked, the rate climbed to 31%.
Solution: Every month, review your top 10 prompts. Update based on results. Version them (v1, v2, v3).
Prompts written in English don't work when translated for Brazilian audiences. Cultural references, expressions, humor, formality: everything is different.
Example: A team used an American marketing prompt to generate copy. The result: phrases like "check out our amazing deal." Nobody in Brazil talks like that.
Solution: Always include in the prompt: "In natural Brazilian Portuguese, as Brazilians would actually say it. No literal translations from English."
If only 1 person on the team uses AI, the gains are limited. The real power of AI in marketing shows up when the whole team operates at the same level.
Example: A marketing head dominated AI and produced 3x more than the team. But the other 4 people kept working manually. Result: bottleneck at the head, team underutilized.
Solution: Create a 2-hour internal training session. Share the prompt library. Do pair-prompting for 1 week. After that, everyone flies solo.
If you build your entire workflow around one tool and it changes the API, raises prices, or goes offline, your marketing stops.
Example: A team built entire automations in ChatGPT. When the rate limit changed, they lost 1 week reorganizing workflows.
Solution: Use your main tool, but know how to use at least 1 alternative. Keep prompts in an external document (not just inside the tool).
After 30-60 days of using AI manually with a method, consider automating the most stable processes.
| Process | Automation Tool | Complexity |
|---|---|---|
| Blog post → social variations | Make/Zapier + AI API | Low |
| Lead enters → email sequence | ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp + AI | Medium |
| Campaign data → automatic report | Google Sheets + API + AI | Medium |
| Negative comment → alert + suggested response | Webhook + AI + Slack | Medium |
| New content published → multi-channel distribution | Make + Buffer/Later + AI | High |
Rule: Only automate what has been working manually for at least 4 weeks. Automating something broken just scales the problem.
| Day | Task | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Mon | Choose one real campaign or content process. Set a baseline (CTR, conversion, CPL, production time). | 30 min |
| Tue | Set up your main tool. Create 3 base prompts (context, production, review). | 45 min |
| Wed | Produce 3 variations of a real piece using AI. Compare with what you would have done manually. | 1h |
| Thu | Adapt the content for 3 different channels using variation prompts. | 45 min |
| Fri | Publish and set up tracking. Start testing. | 30 min |
| Mon | Analyze early results with a campaign analysis prompt. | 30 min |
| Tue | Document: what worked, what to adjust, winning prompts. Share with the team. | 30 min |
Total: ~5 hours over 7 days to have a working AI marketing system in place.
The difference between marketing teams that thrive with AI and those stuck in mediocrity comes down to one thing: system.
Versioned prompts. Documented workflows. Tracked metrics. Continuous testing. Shared library.
Teams with systems scale. Teams without them reinvent the wheel every week.
The Brazilian marketing landscape is splitting in two: on one side, teams that operate with method and deliver results disproportionate to their size. On the other, larger teams still doing everything manually and wondering why their smaller competitor's team produces more.
Which side do you choose?
If you want to apply this method with guided lessons and ready-made templates, TakeAICourse.com has specific tracks for marketing with AI tailored to the Brazilian context.
The best playbook is the one you execute. Start with one process, prove the results, and scale.